Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

863 F.2d 370

Docket No. 88-2855.

Bridge v. Lynaugh

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1989.

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1992

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“on the absence of legal cause for Bridge's failure to raise the 'Franklin ' issue at trial”

quoted by 1 later decision, including King v. Lynaugh

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Scharffe v. Perkins · Selvage v. Lynaugh

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1989-01-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Anthony P. Griffin, Galveston, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.

William C. Zapalac, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Hugh Gibson, District Judge Presiding.

Before POLITZ, WILLIAMS and JONES, Circuit Judges.

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion September 14, 1988, 856 F.2d 712 (5th Cir.1988))

(On Reh'g November 1, 1988, 860 F.2d 162 (5th Cir.1988))

PER CURIAM:

¶1

We have rejected Bridge's claims for a writ of habeas corpus. We were persuaded in the late hour that in fairness we ought to rest our decision there. We remain convinced that we were correct in our original decision, but with the fullness of time, we are now persuaded that our denial should rest on the absence of legal cause for Bridge's failure to raise the "Franklin" issue at trial. See Franklin v. Lynaugh, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 221, 98 L.Ed.2d 180 (1987); Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 97 S.Ct. 2497, 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977). Selvage v. Lynaugh, 842 F.2d 89 (5th Cir.1988). To the extent they are contrary, our earlier writings are withdrawn.

/863/f2d/370 · .json · Public domain