Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 863 F.2d 662 - Boggs v. Lewis

Boggs v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

863 F.2d 662 · 1988

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
July 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Gaus v. Miles, Inc. (1992), United States v. Pineda-Doval (2010)

8 federal appellate · 6 district ·

1301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn · Maddox v. City of Los Angeles · Klaudt v. Flink · Naylor v. Case & McGrath, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “strictly construe the removal statute against removal jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[wjhenever a separate and independent claim or cause of action, which would be removable if sued upon alone, is joined with one or more otherwise non-removable claims or causes of action, the entire case may be removed and the district court may determine all issues therein, or, in its discretion, may remand all matters not otherwise within its original jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]his court reviews the jury instructions and the verdict form together to determine whether the jury was misled”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.