Harris v. Mangum’s Empirical Analysis
863 F.3d 1133 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 1914 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 28 U.S.C. § 451
Relies on Max Lopez Jr v. Ga Smith Larry Loo a Acevedo Patterson 4a-2r · Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. · Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc. · De Long v. Hennessey · Yourish v. California Amplifier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 1915(g) prevents a prisoner with three strikes from filing a case in federal court without prepaying the filing fee, but [the plaintiff] did not file this case in federal court, and he was not required to pay a federal court filing fee. Defendants-were the parties who brought this case to federal court when they removed it from state court, and it wás their responsibility to pay the federal filing fee, as they did in this case. The statute does not prevent an indigent prisoner-plaintiff with three strikes from proceeding in a case that someone else filed in federal court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Woodson v. McCollum“[w]hen a district court dismisses an action because the plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint after being given leave to do so and has not notified the court of his intention not to file an amended complaint, we may deem the dismissal to be for failure to comply with a court order based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Plaintiff-Appellant Jason Harris, an Arizona state prisoner, filed pro se a lawsuit in state court that was subsequently removed....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Naruto v. Slater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.