Reed v. Lieurance’s Empirical Analysis
863 F.3d 1196 · 2017
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An issue of material fact is genuine if there is sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the non-moving party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must view the evidence, including all reasonable inferences, in favor of the nonmoving party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]f conflicting inferences may be drawn from the facts ... the case must go to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.