Panzella v. Sposato’s Empirical Analysis
863 F.3d 210 · 2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Mathews v. Eldridge · Swint v. Chambers County Commission · Fusari v. Steinberg · Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Town of Hyde Park
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]nce a person whose longarms are taken has the opportunity to legally obtain and possess new longarms, the retention of that individual's old longarms does not greatly protect the public from potential harm. It follows that the state's interest in retaining those longarms is similarly diminished.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We therefore hold, consistent with the district court's decision in the instant case, and the decision in Razzano , that persons in [the plaintiff]'s situation are entitled to a prompt post-deprivation hearing under the four conditions set forth by the district court in this case and in Razzano .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the [g]overnment's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.