Cojocari v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
863 F.3d 616 · 2017
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Garrovillas v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Georgis v. Ashcroft · Ren v. Holder · Dong Gao v. Board of Immigration Appeals · Balogun v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must still 'distinguish between inconsistencies ... that are material and those that are not.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable explanations for discrepancies must be considered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“call[s] the [IJ's] overall analysis into question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.