Baines v. Walgreen Co.’s Empirical Analysis
863 F.3d 656 · 2017
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries · Coleman v. Donahoe · Kim v. Nash Finch Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A plaintiff demonstrates a causal connection by showing that the defendant 'would not have taken the adverse ... action but for [his] protected activity.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Evidence offered at summary judgment must be admissible to the same extent as at trial, at least if the opposing party objects , except that testimony can be presented in the form of affidavits or transcripts of sworn testimony rather than in person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“consider all of the evidence in the record in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and we draw all reasonable inferences from that evidence in favor of the party opposing summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.