Lauth v. Covance, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
863 F.3d 708 · 2017
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. · Argyropoulos v. City of Alton · O'Regan v. Arbitration Forums, Inc. · Rowe v. Maremont Corp. · Campania Management Company v. Rooks Pitts & Poust
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The clerk may tax costs on 14 days' notice. On motion served within the next 7 days, the court may review the clerk's action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[A]n employee is similarly situated to a plaintiff if the two employees deal with the same supervisor, are subject to the same standards, and have engaged in similar conduct without such differentiating or mitigating circumstances as would distinguish their employer's treatment of them.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Avina v. Bohlen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.