Harris v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 285
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. · Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), a district court may consider the facts alleged in the counterclaim, documents attached to the counterclaim as exhibits, and documents incorporated by reference in the complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“not tangible personal property, but rather [wa]s intangible intellectual property having no existence apart from the good will of the product or service it symbolize[d],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“extended the tort of conversion to some intangible property rights that are merged in, or identified with, some document or relate to specifically identifiable money.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.