Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 863 NE2D 356 - Radick v. State

Radick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. State · Pierce v. State · Randall v. State · Duncan v. State · Powell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] jury's verdict may be inconsistent or even illogical but nevertheless permissible if it is supported by sufficient evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[dlespite any inconsistency in the verdicts, the convictions are permissible because they are supported by sufficient evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “extremely contradictory and irreconcilable”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.