Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 863 N.E.2d 398 - Nolan v. State

Nolan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. State · Fajardo v. State · Jones v. State · Potter v. State · Robinson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we endeavor to determine [and] effect the intent of the legislature. We examine and interpret a statute as a whole, giving words their common and ordinary meaning and not overemphasizing] strict, literal or selective readings of individual words. The legislative intent as ascertained from the whole prevails over the strict, literal meaning of any word or term used therein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Honesty is a subjective test dealing with what appellant actually believed. Reasonableness is an objective test inquiring what a reasonable man situated in similar cireum-stances would do. To require the giving of appellant's instruction we must find some evidence of both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “negated the culpability required for commission of the offense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.