Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 863 P.2d 40 - State v. Potter

State v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Sokolow · State v. Thurman · Davis v. Meno Guaranty Bank of Meno · State v. Mendoza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we are persuaded that [Thurman] compels the adoption of a bifurcated approach where we review the ultimate determination of reasonable suspicion for error.” The rationale set forth in Thurman therefore controls here. 4 . Delaney claims that the trial court did not address his claim that the stop was illegal. However, the trial court’s first conclusion of law specifically states that the stop”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “A peace officer may stop any person in a public place when he [or she] has a reasonable suspicion to believe he [or she] has committed or is in the act of committing or is attempting to commit a public offense and may demand a name, address and an explanation of his [or her] actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.