Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 863 P2D 856 - Pedersen v. Flannery

Pedersen v. Flannery’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2017

1 district · 6 state decisions

40199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Guin v. Ha · Borg-Warner Corp. v. Avco Corp. · Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. Racine · Pedersen v. Zielski · Haakanson v. Wakefield Seafoods, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Except as otherwise provided by law, a person may not bring an action (1) for libel, slander, assault, battery, seduction, or false imprisonment!);] (2) for personal injury or death, or injury to the rights of another not arising on contract and not specifically provided otherwise; (3) for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property, including an action for its specific recovery ... unless the action is commenced within two years of the accrual of the cause of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When considering questions of law, we are 'not bound by the lower court’s decision’ and will 'adopt the rule of law that is most persuasive in light of precedent, reason, and policy.' ” Id. (quoting Guin v. Ha, 591 P.2d 1281 , 1284 n. 6 (Alaska 1979)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.