Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 863 SO2D 1 - Walker v. State

Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Williams v. Taylor · Kyles v. Whitley · Furman v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]nly where it is reasonably probable that but for the attorney's errors, the outcome of the trial would have been different, will we find that counsel's performance was deficient.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “it cannot be said that the conviction ... resulted from a breakdown in the adversary process that renders the result unreliable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Because we have held that the underlying claims are without merit, [Howard] cannot show the requisite deficient performance and resulting prejudice necessary to establish the various claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.