Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

863 So. 2d 382

Parks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 17, 2003

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-12-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2018

1 state decisions

Relies on 599 So. 2d 645 - McCoy v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-12-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We conclude that the trial court correctly found, after a full evidentiary hearing, that appellant failed to comply with the terms of his plea agreement, thus the trial court properly vacated his sentence and resentenced him. McCoy v. State, 599 So.2d 645 (Fla.1992). The plea agreement required the appellant to testify against his co-defendant, identifying him as the shooter in a homicide prosecution. The testimony was to be consistent with his prior sworn statement. However, at his deposition, appellant claimed that he could not remember most of the information contained in his prior sworn statement, and would not identify the co-defendant as the shooter. We therefore affirm.

/863/so2d/382 · .json · Public domain