Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 863 SW2D 29 - State v. Pully

State v. Pully’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
7
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably State v. Yeargan (1997), Commonwealth v. Alvarado (1996)

39 state decisions

170199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Florida v. Royer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[reasonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable cause not only in the sense that reasonable suspicion can be established with information that is different in quantity or content than that required to establish probable cause, but also in the sense that reasonable suspicion can arise from information that is less reliable than that required to show probable cause.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In general, although the Fourth Amendment requires ‘probable cause’ before an arrest is deemed to be reasonable, the reasonableness of seizures less intrusive than a full-scale arrest is judged by weighing the gravity of the public concern, the degree to which the seizure advances that concern, and the severity of the intrusion into individual privacy. See, e.g., Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50 , 99 S. Ct. 2637, 2640 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 357 (1979).” 863 S.W.2d at 30 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[E]ach prong represents an independently important consideration that must be separately considered and satisfied in some way.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.