Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 863 SW2D 476 - Ex Parte Castellano

Ex Parte Castellano’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Castellano v. Fragozo (2003), Vasquez v. State (2002)

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

1401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 242 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Screws v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “attempted to enlist Clemencia Jiminez as a witness against [Castellano] and aided Maria Sanchez in altering the tape recordings offered into evidence. The tapes were altered to appear that [Castellano] was admitting to the arson when in fact he had no knowledge of its commission”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Sanchez and Fragozo collaborated together and without their testimony and the altered tapes, there is insufficient evidence to sustain a finding of guilt in this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.