¶1ORDER
¶2Defendant appeals from a jury conviction of drug trafficking in the second degree in violation of § 195.223(3) RSMo. (1989). We affirm.
¶3An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).