Dismuke v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
864 F.2d 106 · 1989
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2026
10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on McCarthy v. United States · United States v. Timmreck · Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wisconsin · Walker v. United States · United States v. Dayton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing in Rule 11 requires the trial judge to inform the defendant of every possible defense he may have.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.