District 1199p National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
864 F.2d 1096 · 1989
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2004
16 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc. · Smith v. Allwright · Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Allen v. California · International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Board adopts a rule that is rational and consistent with the Act, then the rule is entitled to deference from the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Where the NLRB applies a doctrine in a radically new way, it is its responsibility to justify its conclusions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“affected employee attitudes towards representation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.