Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 864 F.2d 1128 - Estate of Thompson v. Commissioner

Estate of Thompson v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Estate of Jung v. Commissioner (1993), Scott v. Jones (1992)

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

2201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 2032A · 26 U.S.C. § 2518

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Rowan Cos. v. United States · Estate of Cowser v. Commissioner · Israel-British Bank (London) Ltd. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We must give the statute a common sense interpretation, with an eye towards protecting the family farm and business as Congress intended.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]f a qualified heir disposes of any interest in qualified real property to any member of [her or] his family, such member shall thereafter be treated as the qualified heir with respect to such interest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[T]he estate tax can impose acute problems when the principal asset of the estate is equity in a farm or small business. Because assets are valued at their “highest and best use” rather than on the specific use to which the assets are being put and because these assets are illiquid, family members have been forced to sell farms and small businesses in order to pay the estate tax.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.