Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 864 F.2d 113 - Stevens v. Gay

Stevens v. Gay’s Empirical Analysis

864 F.2d 113 · 1989

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
November 2013
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably Nolin v. Douglas County (1990), Miller v. King

8 federal appellate ·

1601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Kentucky v. Graham · Hans v. State of Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a party may amend the party's pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a defendant has not been prevailed against, either because of legal immunity or on the merits, Sec. 1988 does not authorize a fee award against that defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the Eleventh Amendment does not prohibit a plaintiff from suing state officials in their official capacities for prospective injunctive relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.