Gladden v. Roach’s Empirical Analysis
864 F.2d 1196 · 1989
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Duckett v. City of Cedar Park (1992), United States v. Gonzales (1997)
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Pierson v. Ray · City of Houston v. Hill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Interrogation is defined as words or actions that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“You are instructed that any person who claims damages as a result of an alleged wrongful act on the part of another has a duty under the law to mitigate those damages, that is, to take advantage of an opportunity he may have had under the circumstances to reduce or minimize the loss or damage. So, in regard to the plaintiffs arrest and detention ..., if you should find from a preponderance of the evidence that plaintiff failed to seek out or take advantage of an opportunity to be released from jail ... including the bail bond tendered by [Gladden’s friend] and any opportunity his father may have had to obtain his release, if ye so find, then you should reduce the amount of his damages by the amount of any damages he could have avoided if he had taken advantage of such opportunity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lawson v. Trowbridge“questions seeking biographical information for booking purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.