Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 864 F.2d 201 - Carey v. Bahama Cruise Lines

Carey v. Bahama Cruise Lines’s Empirical Analysis

864 F.2d 201 · 1988

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
10
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 24 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Intergen N.V. v. Grina (2003), Horta v. Sullivan (1993)

35 federal appellate · 24 district · 11 state decisions — followed in 10 states

6101988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Hawn · Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... an injury to a cruise ship passenger caused by a sliding gangway that connected the cruise ship to a tender is a uniquely maritime injury”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “permits a plaintiff whose claim is cognizable under either jurisdiction to identify his claim as an admiralty claim to obtain certain procedural benefits traditionally available under admiralty jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An appellee need not cross-appeal 'to argue that there are alternative grounds that support the judgment below.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.