Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 864 F.2d 241 - In re Bushkin Associates, Inc.

In re Bushkin Associates, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

864 F.2d 241 · 1989

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably United States v. Horn (1994), In re American Airlines, Inc. (1992)

42 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

26019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Relies on Allied Chemical Corporation v. Daiflon Inc · Wheat v. United States · Taylor v. Illinois · Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “assist other jurists, parties, or lawyers”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Dist. Ct. · 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 67 - MASS LAND ACQUISITION, LLC v. DIST. CT. (SIERRA PAC. POWER CO.)
  2. “'Mandamus entreaties are generally subject to a pair of prophylactic rules, which together require that a petitioner show (a) some special risk of irreparable harm, and (b) clear entitlement to the relief requested.' In re Recticel Foam Corp., 859 F.2d 1000 , 1005 (1st Cir.1988) (footnote omitted).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. United States v. Collamore · United States v. Patterson
  3. “generally thought an inappropriate prism through which to inspect exercises of judicial discretion,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re: Da Graca v. · Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Hantzis

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.