Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 864 F.2d 635 - Sparling

Sparling’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

160
cited by 160 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 42 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 160 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024 · most notably Bercovitch v. Baldwin School, Inc. (1998), Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc. (1999)

4 federal appellate · 42 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 11 states

72019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Van Dusen v. Barrack · Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 160 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought. 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (a) provides as follows: The district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any harm to [plaintiffs] due to their status as guarantors of the bonds given by the corporation is also derivative of the harm to the corporation. Thus, this status does not give [plaintiffs] standing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “but does not preclude summary judgment when all claims are barred by an arbitration clause”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.