Odeon Capital Group LLC v. Ackerman’s Empirical Analysis
864 F.3d 191 · 2017
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on Forsythe International, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Co. · Bonar v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. · Panther Partners Inc. v. Ikanos Communications, Inc. · Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara · Porzig v. Dresdner, Kleinwort, Benson, North America LLC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A petitioner seeking to vacate an award on the ground of fraud must adequately plead that (1) respondent engaged in fraudulent activity; (2) even with the exercise of due diligence, petitioner could not have discovered the fraud prior to the award issuing; and (3) the fraud materially related to an issue in the arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“For fraud to be material ... petitioner must demonstrate a nexus between the alleged fraud and the decision made by the arbitrators, although petitioner need not demonstrate that the arbitrators would have reached a different result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“requiring a nexus between the alleged fraud and the basis for the panel's decision”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.