Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 864 NE2D 1011 - Row v. Holt

Row v. Holt’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Filip v. Block (2008), Cole v. State (2007)

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 20 state decisions

16020072010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Whren v. United States · Hunter v. Bryant · United States v. Hensley · Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““proof of the absence of probable cause is essential to the plaintiffs cause of action for false arrest.... Probable cause for arrest is demonstrated by facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer which would warrant a person of reasonable caution and prudence in believing that the accused had committed or was committing a criminal offense. Thus, if the plaintiff in a false arrest action fails to demonstrate the absence of probable cause, or if the record as a whole reflects probable cause for the arrest, then the plaintiffs case must fail and the inquiry comes to a halt.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.