Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 864 P2D 442 - Bredthauer v. TSP

Bredthauer v. TSP’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Kathy S. Crofts v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Department of Game and Fish (2016), Cooper v. Town of Pinedale (2000)

34 state decisions

1401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. Allen · Hatten R. Co. v. Baylies Et Ux. · Matter of Paternity of JRW · Gray v. Fitzhugh · Oatts v. Jorgenson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is unfair to reverse a ruling of a trial court for reasons that were not presented to it, whether it be legal theories or issues never formally raised in the pleadings nor argued to the trial court.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] party who by his pleadings, statements or contentions, under oath, has assumed a particular position in a judicial proceeding is estopped to assume an inconsistent position in a subsequent action.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'Statutes of repose and statutes of limitations are often confused. They are similar in that both prescribe the time period within which a plaintiff may commence his suit. The distinguishing feature between the two is the time at which the respective periods commence. Generally, * * * if the plaintiff's cause of action acerues and the statutory period commences when the injury occurs, or, as is most often the case, when the plaintiff is or should be aware that he has been injured, the statute is properly termed a statute of limitations. If the statutory period commences upon the occurrence of an event, regardless of when the injury occurs, at a time when the plaintiff may or may not be aware of any injury, the statute is properly termed a statute of repose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.