Cameron v. Beard’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Bowden v. Caldor, Inc. (1998), Chizmar v. MacKie (1995)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · 1 Cal. 4th 1083 - Gantt v. Sentry Insurance · 113 Wis. 2d 561 - Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet · Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford · Wagner v. City of Globe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Clonstructive discharge occurs where the employer either intentionally created or knowingly permitted working conditions that are so intolerable or aggravated at the time of the employee's resignation that a reasonable employer would realize that a reasonable person in the employee's position would be compelled to resign.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The superior court erroneously interpreted our decision in Beard I as conclusively deciding the exhaustion issue. Our decision merely reversed the court’s ruling in favor of the State and did not constitute a final determination that Beard was excused from pursuing his remedies under the collective bargaining agreement. Beard never sought summary judgment on this issue and the State never had an opportunity to rebut the evidence presented in Beard’s opposition. The doctrine of res judicata does not apply when one party has not had an opportunity to litigate an issue. We therefore remand this issue to the superior court for an evidentiary hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Beard“[t]his court has refused to prescribe a definite ratio between compensatory and punitive damages. Though comparing punitive and actual damages awards is one way to determine if punitive damages are excessive, other factors, such as the magnitude and flagrancy of the offense, the importance of the policy violated, and the defendant’s wealth, are equally important to the determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.