864 So. 2d 1041 - Hebert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 574 So. 2d 685 - McQuarter v. State · Leatherwood v. State · 644 So. 2d 451 - Moody v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court has considerable discretion in determining whether to grant an evidentiary hearing. Not every motion for post-conviction relief filed in the trial court must be afforded a full adversarial hearing. A trial judge may disregard the assertions made by a post-conviction movant where, as here, they are substantially contradicted by the court record of proceedings that led up to the entry of a judgment of guilt.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Coleman v. State · Magyar v. State“with Dave Holley, [1] a district attorney investigator, and never viewed the complete video of Miller's statement. The State argues that, although Miller complains about the lack of any pretrial investigation, he has”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“not demonstrated prejudice where, as here, he has not alleged anything that would have led to a different result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.