864 So. 2d 1153 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 714 So. 2d 429 - State v. Mancino · Davis v. State · 823 So. 2d 746 - MacK v. State · 764 So. 2d 829 - Hampton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a challenge to the sufficiency of the reasons for a trial court's retention of jurisdiction over a sentence is analogous to a challenge to a trial court's failure to provide departure reasons for a sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wright v. State“challenge to the trial court's failure to provide reasons for retaining jurisdiction is not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wright v. State“a challenge to departure reasons is not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Concepcion v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.