Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 865 F.2d 739 - Rodriquez v. Bowen

Rodriquez v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

865 F.2d 739 · 1989

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2025
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Gisbrecht v. Barnhart (2002), Perotti v. Seiter (1991)

33 federal appellate · 6 district ·

42019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 30 U.S.C. § 923 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 7604

Relies on Blum v. Stenson · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air · Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman · Briggs v. Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “chooses not to give effect to the terms of the agreement, it should state for the record the deductions being made and the reasons therefore.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “should be given the weight ordinarily accorded a rebuttable presumption.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]here a case has been submitted on boilerplate pleadings, in which no issues of material fact are present and where no legal research is apparent, the benchmark twenty-five percent of awards fee would obviously be inappropriate.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.