Weingarten v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
865 F.3d 48 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 18 U.S.C. § 3283 · 18 U.S.C. § 3286 (§ 120001 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 3293 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Taylor v. United States · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Jones v. Barnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Supreme Court's modern categorical approach jurisprudence is confined to the post-conviction contexts of criminal sentencing and immigration deportation cases”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“particularly difficult to categorize the presumptively impermissible effects of retroactively applying a statute of limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“difference between revoking a vested statute of limitations defense and extending a filing period for live claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.