865 F. Supp. 2d 850 - Shearson v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 49 U.S.C. § 44926 · 49 U.S.C. § 46110 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974) · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Mathews v. Eldridge · Scheuer v. Rhodes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Plaintiff has not alleged that a judicially manageable standard exists for reviewing Defendants' inclusion of persons on the TSDB or a derivative watch list. Nor is there any statute that provides a standard of review. Instead, Defendants' authority to create and maintain watchlists is derived from the President's Executive powers and Defendants' general authority to secure the national borders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Amiri v. Nielsen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.