Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 865 NE2D 652 - Foreman v. State

Foreman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hollars v. State · In re Conn · Indiana Gaming Commission v. Moseley · Conner v. State · Laughner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The nature and extent of penal sanctions is primarily a legislative consideration, and our review of legislative prescrip tions of punishment is “highly restrained” and “very deferential.” We ■will not disturb the legislature’s determination of the appropriate penalty unless there is a showing of clear constitutional infirmity. Additionally, we are not at liberty to set aside a legislatively sanctioned penalty merely because it seems too severe.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.