Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 865 NE2D 704 - Dixson v. State

Dixson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2021

7 state decisions

40200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. U.S. Bank N.A. · Smylie v. State · Fajardo v. State · Kindred v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Sec. 1.3. (a) For purposes of sections 3 through 7 of this chapter, "advisory sentence” means a guideline sentence that the court may voluntarily consider as the midpoint between the maximum sentence and the minimum sentence. (b) Except as provided in subsection (c), a court is not required to use an advisory sentence. (c) In imposing: (1)consecutive sentences for felony convictions that are not crimes of violence (as defined in IC 35-50-1-2(a)) arising out of an episode of criminal conduct, in accordance with IC 35-50-1-2; (2) an additional fixed term to an habitual offender under section 8 of this chapter; or (3) an additional fixed term to a repeat sexual offender under section 14 of this chapter; a Court is required to use the appropriate advisory sentence in imposing a consecutive sentence or an additional fixed term. However, the court is not required to use the advisory sentence in imposing the sentence for the underlying offense. (d)This section does not require a court to use an advisory sentence in imposing consecutive sentences for felony convictions that do not arise out of an episode of criminal conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.