Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

865 So. 2d 1277

865 So.2d 1277

29 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 64

Paul v. Paul

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 5, 2004

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 2004-02-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2006

1 state decisions

Relies on Parham v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-02-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Paul v. Paul, 807 So.2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), a decision which the district court of appeal certified to be in direct conflict with the decision of another district court pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

¶2It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.QUINCE, J., dissents.
/865/so2d/1277 · .json · Public domain