¶1Granted and remanded to the First Circuit Court of Appeal for briefing, argument and opinion solely on the issue of whether a plaintiffs settlement with an insured eliminates an insurer’s obligation to pay the plaintiff according to the terms that the policy would otherwise require.
865 So. 2d 44
Sumrall v. Bickham
Decided January 30, 2004
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2004-01-30
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2004
1 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“opinion solely on the issue of whether a plaintiff's settlement with an insured eliminates an insurer's obligation to pay the plaintiff according to the terms that the policy would otherwise require.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Sumrall v. Bickham
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2004-01-30
View the full empirical analysis of this case →