Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

865 So. 2d 637

Docket No. 2D03-4057.

Lott v. State

Clarence LOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 2004.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-02-11

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2008

4 state decisions

Relies on Toot v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-02-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1WHATLEY, Judge.

¶2Clarence Lott seeks review of the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court summarily denied his motion without any explanation or record attachments. It also failed to inform Lott of his right to appeal within thirty days. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reconsideration of Lott's motion in accordance with our opinion in Suleiman v. State,861 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). If the trial court again summarily denies the motion, it must set forth its rationale and attach any relevant portions of the record which support its denial.

¶3Reversed and remanded.

¶4SILBERMAN and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

/865/so2d/637 · .json · Public domain