Richardson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Loyd v. ECO Resources, Inc. (1997), Crittenden v. State (1995)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Hudson v. Palmer · Rawlings v. Kentucky · United States v. Amen · United States v. Hershenow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In other words, in determining the legitimacy of appellant’s expectation of privacy, the appropriate inquiry is whether appellant expected that the numbers he dialed on the telephone would be free from governmental intrusion, and, if he did, is this expectation one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Uresti v. State“the use of a pen register may well constitute a ‘search’ under Article I, § 9 of the Texas Constitution,” and remanded the case to determine whether such a search would be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Vara v. Sharp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.