United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
866 F.2d 1092 · 1989
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably United States v. Wunder (1990), United States v. Collins (1990)
43 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 44 U.S.C. § 3502 · 44 U.S.C. § 3504 (Government Paperwork Elimination Act) · 44 U.S.C. § 3507 · 44 U.S.C. § 3512
Relies on Blackledge v. Perry · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Russell v. United States · Francis v. Henderson · Carstea v. Poplar Tree Homeowners Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[d]efenses and objections based on defects in the indictment or information”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“states: 66 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to maintain or provide information to any agency if the information collection request involved was made after December 31, 1981, and does not display a current control number assigned by the Director, or fails to state that such request is not subject to this chapter. 67 The Act defines”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to mean 68 a written report form, application form, schedule, questionnaire, reporting or recordkeeping requirement, or other similar method calling for the collection of information[.] 69 Form 1500, the official form for submitting Medicare claims, was approved by the Director and has a control number. At the time of the events in this case, however, the Secretary had not submitted the Manual to the Director for his approval, apparently on the theory that the Act did not cover it, and the Manual therefore did not bear a control number. 70 The appellants contend that the Manual was an”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.