Samarzia v. Clark County

Decided Feb. 3, 1989.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1989-02-03

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-02-03

How this case has been cited

Cited by 198 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2017 · most notably United States v. Galloway (1995), 51 Cal. 3d 1179 - People v. Gonzalez (1990)

122 federal appellate · 16 district · 12 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before TANG, SCHROEDER and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

¶2ORDER

¶3The opinion, filed October 3, 1988, is to be amended as follows:

¶4In the second paragraph of the second column on page 91, add an additional closed parentheses mark immediately before the period at the end of the paragraph.

¶5In the fourth paragraph of the second column on page 91, delete the quotation marks at the beginning and at the end of this sentence: “In reviewing the directed verdict in this case, we must take as true the evidence Samarzia offered concerning discriminatory attitudes towards him based on age.”