United States v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis
866 F.2d 749 · 1989
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably United States v. Davis (1990), United States v. Bell (1992)
21 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1590 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Pelaes v. United States · Domby v. United States · McGuire v. United States · United States v. Carr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) Whether the defendant has asserted his innocence. 2) Whether the government would suffer prejudice. 3) Whether the defendant has delayed in filing his motion. 4) Whether withdrawal would substantially inconvenience the court. 5) Whether close assistance of counsel was present. 6) Whether the original plea was knowing and voluntary. 7) Whether the withdrawal would waste judicial resources; and as applicable the reason why defenses advanced later were not proffered at the original time of the original pleading, or the reasons why a defendant delayed in making his withdrawal motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Conditional Pleas. With the approval of the court and the consent of the government, a defendant may enter a conditional plea of guilty or nolo contendere, reserving in writing the right, on appeal from the judgment, to review of the adverse determination of any specified pretrial motion. A defendant who prevails on appeal shall be allowed to withdraw the plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.