Lowrance v. Hacker’s Empirical Analysis
866 F.2d 950 · 1989
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2015
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · 116 Ill. 2d 528 - Airey v. Department of Revenue · Fey v. Walston & Co. · Shaw v. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation · 132 Ill. App. 3d 260 - W. E. Erickson Construction, Inc. v. Congress-Kenilworth Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Accord and satisfaction understood in our settlement agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lowrance v. Hacker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.