Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 866 F.3d 152 - Millhouse v. Heath

Millhouse v. Heath’s Empirical Analysis

866 F.3d 152 · 2017

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
June 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Bowles v. Russell · Stump v. Sparkman · Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie · Jones v. Bock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a strike under § 1915(g) will accrue only if the entire action or appeal is (1) dismissed explicitly because it is 'frivolous,' 'malicious,' or 'fails to state a claim' or (2) dismissed pursuant to a statutory provision or rule that is limited solely to dismissals for such reasons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “look to the date the notice of appeal is filed in assessing whether a dismissal counts as a strike. Strikes accrued after this date simply do not count under § 1915(g).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.