Gresham v. Swanson’s Empirical Analysis
866 F.3d 853 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission · Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission · Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc. · 135 S. Ct. 2218 - Reed v. Town of Gilbert · Matal v. Tam
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A district court considering injunctive relief evaluates the movant's likelihood of success on the merits, the threat of irreparable harm to the movant, the balance of the equities between the parties, and whether an injunction is in the public interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) Messages from school districts to students, parents, or employees[;] (2) Messages to subscribers with whom the caller has a current business or personal relationship[; and] (3) Messages advising employees of work schedules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he balance of the statute pre-existed the amendment, and we presume that the Minnesota legislature would have retained the pre-existing statute”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.