Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 866 F.3d 943 - Riddle v. Riepe

Riddle v. Riepe’s Empirical Analysis

866 F.3d 943 · 2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
December 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Moran v. Clarke · David Hanten v. The School District of Riverview Gardens · White v. McKinley · Carpenter v. Gage · Winslow v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under the Act, requiring preemption of state regulation. In the absence of direct guidance from the FCC explicitly classifying VoIP services, the district court interpreted the Act with reference to prior FCC orders, and concluded that Spectrum Voice was an information service. The MPUC now appeals. II. Discussion We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo ,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the nonmovant. Riddle v. Riepe , 866 F.3d 943 , 946 (8th Cir. 2017) (quoting Helmig v. Fowler , 828 F.3d 755 , 760 (8th Cir. 2016) ). Summary judgment is appropriate if”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.