United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
866 F.3d 982 · 2017
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2250 · 18 U.S.C. § 2252
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Griffin v. Wisconsin · Samson v. California · 134 S. Ct. 2473 - Riley v. Cal. United States · United States v. Reyes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Riley addressed privacy interests of an arrestee, not the circumscribed interests of an offender serving a term of [SR]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Federal supervised release ... is meted out in addition to, not in lieu of, incarceration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“supervised release ... involves 'the most circumscribed expectations of privacy.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.