Wright v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2011
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1347 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Baxter v. Palmigiano · United States v. Gaubert · United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense · Indian Towing Company v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is negligent and not within the discretionary function exemption....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.